Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 733
70% 581 Pts
64-Core 1154
71% 1154 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1619 MHz, MLim: 1821 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 64.9
Reflection 86.7
Parallax 58
53% 69.9 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 59.8
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 456 457 457 436 459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 448
Mixed 375
SusWrite 453
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 33.7
125% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 168
158% 241 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JAD3200U1808 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.1% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.1
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 VIE2150 ATHEN U2L 21
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback