Performance Results

Gaming 148%
Desktop 106%
Workstation 156%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive341% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D91
MotherboardMSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D91)  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220928
Uptime5 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:56
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$154
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 76.4
1-Core 188
2-Core 375
111% 213 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 1,185
110% 920 Pts
64-Core 1720
106% 1720 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$374
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 190
Parallax 208
171% 203 fps
MRender 286
Gravity 165
Splatting 124
149% 192 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 151%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$165
592GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1617 1862 1833 1833 1822 1806 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
341% Outstanding
Read 2,314
Write 2186
Mixed 1,613
SusWrite 1,795
444% 1,977 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 64.6
236% 90.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,737
DQ Write 1271
DQ Mixed 1208
983% 1,405 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 341%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 20.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 27" 2560 1369 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D91) Builds (Compare 1,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 290%
Desktop 122%
Workstation 346%

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback