Today's hottest deals

Simply LLM1v6PK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSimply LLM1v6PK  (all builds)
MotherboardSAPPHIRE BP-FP5-SA1
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:54
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B Vega Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 184
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 427
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Sapphire(1DA2 1062) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.50.23.01
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.52% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 15.1
9% 11 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 9.5
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.52%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
480gb PCIe Drive 480GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PNPC002A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 389 346 284 275 233 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.1% Excellent
Read 200
Write 413
Mixed 525
SusWrite 317
83% 364 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 26.6
92% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 330
320% 508 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 26.9
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 22
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 15.5" 1280 720 GWD0156 ARZOPA
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback