Gigabyte GA-B360M HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B360M-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M HD3  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:53
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 212
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 379
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.67 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,616
Write 764
Mixed 801
233% 1,060 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 50.9
164% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 503
DQ Mixed 565
428% 579 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 244%
13GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8.6 11 19 17 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.32% Terrible
Read 33.9
Write 1
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 14.3
12% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.32%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2490 2490W1
Typical GA-B360M HD3 Builds (Compare 669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 51%
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback