Today's hottest deals

Jingsha X99M-H2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemJingsha X99M-H2  (all builds)
MotherboardSZMZ X99M-G2
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:53
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 745
71% 587 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$281
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 120
Parallax 125
110% 127 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 103
Splatting 88.8
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$73
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 221 241 242 248 248 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73% Very good
Read 256
Write 246
Mixed 229
SusWrite 229
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 39.7
129% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 115
106% 162 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73%
Great: 127%
Intenso Sata III 480GB
232GB free
Firmware: S0513A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 217 66 12 134 244 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.4% Above average
Read 257
Write 241
Mixed 231
SusWrite 142
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 25.5
110% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 46.9
68% 125 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 101%
S3SSDD480 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: U0806A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1042 1269 1542 1554 1587 1589 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,572
Write 1,510
Mixed 1,067
SusWrite 1,430
314% 1,395 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 23.2
140% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 864
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 577
490% 719 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 226%
Great: 242%
S3SSDD480 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: U0806A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1388 1342 1419 1418 1415 1416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,660
Write 1,503
Mixed 1,064
SusWrite 1,400
316% 1,407 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 23.7
140% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 579
494% 727 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 228%
Great: 242%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
852GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 94 93 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 88.1
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 94.5
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.4% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23" 1280 720 HWP3187 HP 23cw
Typical X99M-H2 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

System: Jingsha X99M-H2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $258Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback