MSI H310M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B28)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B28
MotherboardMSI H310M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B28)  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:52
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600-$155
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 665
74% 583 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 107
Parallax 66.9
56% 80.8 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 64.9
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 201 156 119 98 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 477
Write 156
Mixed 200
SusWrite 145
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 33.6
129% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 149
139% 222 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79%
Great: 128%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
200GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 149
Write 128
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 104
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 23.9
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 25.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 11% 9 212 52 144 27" 1280 720 ACR064E Acer KG271 C
Typical H310M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B28) Builds (Compare 601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H310M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B28)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback