PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B28 |
Motherboard | MSI H310M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B28) (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180718 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 19 '23 at 22:52 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
80.1%
Excellent
|
80% 149 Pts
|
74% 583 Pts
|
44% 707 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$140
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.3%
Above average
|
56% 80.8 fps
|
54% 66.8 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$50
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 201 156 119 98 94 MB/s
|
79%
Very good
|
54% 245 MB/s
|
129% 46.4 MB/s
|
139% 222 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
200GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 105 105 104 MB/s
|
73.1%
Very good
|
74% 102 MB/s
|
368% 2.8 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
80.5%
Excellent
|
81% 28.5 GB/s
|
68% 23.9 GB/s
|
67% 59.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1% | 11% | 9 | 212 | 52 | 144 | 27" | 1280 720 | ACR064E Acer KG271 C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-8400Intel $160Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 117x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 87x |
Core i7-8700Intel $296Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 67x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $140Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 88x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $100Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 50x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 30x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Outstanding | Total price: $322 |