MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$129
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 164
2-Core 329
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 837
83% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$374
Palit(1569 F308) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 182
Parallax 196
162% 192 fps
MRender 282
Gravity 162
Splatting 121
146% 188 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 145%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1679 1749 1784 1781 1788 1787 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,130
Write 1,817
Mixed 1,447
SusWrite 1,761
402% 1,789 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 47.4
233% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 753
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 578
536% 813 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 303%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 35.7
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 37.2
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 4R 5G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 10% 113 219 60 60 23.8" 1920 1017 BNQ7FCC BenQ EX240N
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 1,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback