Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H310M A 2.0
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF  (all builds)
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190308
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:46
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 228
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 554
60% 478 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 82.4
50% 68.2 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 48.8
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO 2TB
442GB free
Firmware: EIFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 818 821 839 988 988 1010 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 947
Write 1,018
Mixed 1,022
SusWrite 911
220% 974 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 58.3
182% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 906
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 871
656% 877 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 190%
Great: 589%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 97 95 73 75 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 364
Write 180
Mixed 289
SusWrite 84.4
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 21.1
75% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 183
159% 235 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
238GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 135 136 129 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 132
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 131
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
38GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 113 98 123 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 155
Write 129
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 116
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 106 90 98 95 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 112
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 98.1
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 24.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 22.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 1R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 26% 47 156 2 144 23.5" 1280 720 VSC36AF VX2458 Series
Typical GA-H310M A 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback