Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:40
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 85.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 978
91% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,480
92% 1,480 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 212
Parallax 128
107% 157 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 153
Splatting 128
127% 159 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 111%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG220400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 362
Mixed 308
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 13.7
60% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 24.5
39% 75.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 60%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$37
553GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 129 127 128 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 88
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 127
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
62GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 109 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 108
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G KHX2666C16/16G KHX2666C16/16G KHX2400C15/16G 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 23.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 0P 4R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 12% 74 217 60 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2WG4
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $895
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback