Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DY
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200309
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:39
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 50.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 177
60% 110 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 480
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Asus(1043 17C1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 10
Parallax 34.9
21% 23.6 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 25
22% 27.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 255 260 243 240 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 563
Write 290
Mixed 309
SusWrite 251
78% 353 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 40.7
125% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 617
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 332
289% 435 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 187%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB
51GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 81 91 80 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.8% Average
Read 255
Write 166
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 86.4
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 26.1
85% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 58.6
75% 136 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.1% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 8G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 40% 47 199 42 120 15.5" 1536 864 NCP0036
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY Builds (Compare 589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback