Today's hottest deals

HP 23-q158la

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHP 23-q158la  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B44
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:26
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Memory 14.1
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 75.8
22% 42.8 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 124
18% 129 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 2B44) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.1001
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 6.3
3% 4.77 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 4.3
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate SSD 1TB
783GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST8S1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 277 228 227 169 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 333
Write 272
Mixed 275
SusWrite 234
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 16.6
59% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 174
143% 205 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 339
12% 339 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 30 60 23" 1280 720 HWP4224 HP ALL-in-One
Typical 23-q158la Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 23-q158la

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback