Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17K3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE76 Raider 11UH
MotherboardMSI MS-17K3  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 20:07
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 65.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 199
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 641
58% 485 Pts
64-Core 1,071
66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 98%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162 1TB
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 627 635 316 357 503 538 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1377
Write 1,884
Mixed 1,488
SusWrite 496
296% 1,311 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 56.6
192% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 906
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 719
564% 782 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 181%
Great: 386%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 34.3
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 15
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 96%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 21 213 58 60 0" 1280 720
Typical MS-17K3 Builds (Compare 3,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17K3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback