Asus X200MA

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus X200MA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X200MA
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140911
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '23 at 20:07
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2840 20,923 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Memory 50.9 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 28.3 25% 33.4 Pts	4-Core 30.8 8-Core 31.4 4% 31.1 Pts	64-Core 34.7 2% 34.7 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 15BD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4176 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CG-128 128GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: VE0R6327 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 92 102 94 102 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.7% Poor	Read 101 Write 95.7 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 99.1 22% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 12.9 43% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 67.4 DQ Write 82 DQ Mixed 71.2 55% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-H9 1x2GB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 18%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	20	16	60	11.6"	1280 720	AUO305C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X200MA Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 14%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X200MA

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	49x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	25x
Celeron N2815IntelBench 27%, 1,028 samples	24x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	132x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $22Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
MX500 500GBCrucial $34Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 15%, 196 samples	24x
HMT451S6AFR6A-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 16%, 130 samples	22x
EDJ4216EFBG-GNL-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 24%, 494 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $22

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $140	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $56	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X200MA

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Asus X200MA

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)