Asus X200MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X200MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X200MA
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 20:07
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2840
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 50.9
1-Core 20.9
2-Core 28.3
25% 33.4 Pts
4-Core 30.8
8-Core 31.4
4% 31.1 Pts
64-Core 34.7
2% 34.7 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 15BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4176
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CG-128 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R6327
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 92 102 94 102 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.7% Poor
Read 101
Write 95.7
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 99.1
22% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 12.9
43% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 67.4
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 71.2
55% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-H9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 20 16 60 11.6" 1280 720 AUO305C
Typical X200MA Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X200MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $48
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback