Today's hottest deals

Asrock H310CM-IB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-IB  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 19:35
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$273
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 131
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 950
90% 744 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.9% Very good
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 91.2
Parallax 82.5
75% 88.6 fps
MRender 86.9
Gravity 85
Splatting 72.8
66% 81.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 98 80 85 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 386
Write 90.5
Mixed 146
SusWrite 92.6
39% 179 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 14
92% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 118
82% 103 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 101%
Apricorn SATAWire 6G 480GB
113GB free
Firmware: 1411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 232 76 18 106 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 358
Write 330
Mixed 10.4
SusWrite 100
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.4
31% 7.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
342GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 108 106 107 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 167
Write 160
Mixed 99.3
SusWrite 107
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 21.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 31 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical H310CM-IB Builds (Compare 1,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-IB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $263
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback