Asus H610I-IM-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus H610I-IM-A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H610I-IM-A
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 19:21
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-13500-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 77.1
1-Core 198
2-Core 387
114% 221 Pts
4-Core 750
8-Core 1,318
125% 1,034 Pts
64-Core 2,095
130% 2,095 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 109%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 886E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4672
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
7.47% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 9.5
7% 10.2 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 9.1
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.47%
Great: 9%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kimtigo 256GB 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0514A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,985
Write 1,108
Mixed 1,004
300% 1,365 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 28.8
226% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 701
DQ Write 873
DQ Mixed 461
438% 678 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 230%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FF 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 27.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 21.3
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 27" 2560 1369 AUS27E1 PA279CRV
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $215Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $140Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $56G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback