Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime6 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 18:30
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$93
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 262
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 430
52% 397 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 145
Parallax 134
108% 137 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 122
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1212 1277 1253 1263 1244 1199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,411
Write 2,119
Mixed 1,698
SusWrite 1,242
418% 1,867 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 87
292% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,429
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 1,144
867% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 316%
Great: 372%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
44GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 143 143 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 332
Mixed 358
SusWrite 163
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 51.1
182% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 179
183% 298 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
105GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 153 140 151 162 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 147
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 164
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$50
84GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 118 94 112 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50% Average
Read 63.6
Write 67.5
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 110
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 26.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 BNQ7950 BenQ EW3270U
Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $611
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback