Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Gaming 30%
Desktop 76%
Workstation 28%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 15:38
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 619
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 751
46% 751 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8561) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1505 MHz, MLim: 1790 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 46.9
Parallax 41.5
35% 43.8 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 36.8
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 156 90 15 247 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 502
Write 430
Mixed 435
SusWrite 158
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 31.5
144% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 54.6
100% 193 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
927GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 161 162 165 165 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 140
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 161
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905713-008.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 21.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.5" 1280 720 HWP3183 HP 22cw
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 29%
Desktop 79%
Workstation 27%

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback