Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 13:52
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 225
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 661
69% 551 Pts
64-Core 872
54% 872 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.7% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 145
Parallax 168
94% 143 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 125
Splatting 98.7
92% 115 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STRSD013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 469 448 89 34 296 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 487
Mixed 448
SusWrite 299
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 53.9
177% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 367
276% 367 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 110%
Great: 136%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
465GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1158 666 639 636 647 896 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,945
Write 2,127
Mixed 1686
SusWrite 774
367% 1,633 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 63
211% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 761
553% 728 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 222%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 31.4
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 27.5
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 SPT0961 F24
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback