Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 days ago, 15 days ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220607
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 13:32
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 82.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 232
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 718
70% 575 Pts
64-Core 887
55% 887 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
XFX(1EAE 6606) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.8.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.1% Above average
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 134
Parallax 285
0% 140 fps
MRender 249
Gravity 145
Splatting 201
162% 199 fps
Poor: 117%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 127%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.04C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 53 51 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 52.8
Write 51.3
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 47.2
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
71% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
8GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 150
Write 144
Mixed 83.7
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 33.4
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 31
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 75 24" 1280 720 AUS24CB ASUS VP248
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $406
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $316Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $29
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $399Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12600K $215Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback