Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82C5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82C5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 12:34
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 93.9
35% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 210
26% 202 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Legend(17AA 3FDC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.97 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM256GDHTNI-87A0B 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11020C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 597 438 309 291 298 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 254
Write 491
Mixed 565
SusWrite 372
96% 420 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 14.3
62% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 562
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 500
367% 485 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 176%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 270
15% 270 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 3 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO61ED
Typical 82C5 Builds (Compare 1,097 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $378
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback