Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3V  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 12:22
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 170
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 234
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.3% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 44.9
31% 43.2 fps
MRender 53.1
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 38.4
37% 46.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAH20107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 104 150 113 60 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 312
Write 250
Mixed 241
SusWrite 115
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 10.5
56% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 59.9
DQ Mixed 22.4
24% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600DDAD3 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 3R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 21% 28 192 12 60 23" 1920 1009 ACR0282 S230HL
Typical GA-B75M-D3V Builds (Compare 1,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback