Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 7 days ago, 6 days ago, 3 hrs ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS (all builds)
Memory	60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '23 at 12:21
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 111 2-Core 203 79% 135 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 736 66% 559 Pts	64-Core 934 58% 934 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.8% Average	Lighting 55.6 Reflection 65.7 Parallax 58.3 45% 59.9 fps	MRender 62.8 Gravity 58.8 Splatting 51.9 47% 57.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1603 1664 1699 1695 1670 1431 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	275% Outstanding	Read 1,750 Write 1,468 Mixed 564 SusWrite 1627 303% 1,352 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 60 216% 80.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,020 DQ Write 744 DQ Mixed 635 542% 800 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 275% Great: 306%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$92 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 757GB free Firmware: FP2A Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 106 Write 116 Mixed 58.7 69% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$130 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 306GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 86 84 85 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 83.7 Write 83.4 Mixed 61.6 SusWrite 84.6 58% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 99%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$52 4,260 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 69GB free Firmware: 01.01K02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 136 135 136 135 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 153 Write 146 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 135 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 96%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB 1,509 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 121GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 98.8 Write 42.2 Mixed 50.4 71% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.5 124% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 45%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$11 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 58GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 107 Write 48.2 Mixed 12.4 56% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 44% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.3% Very good	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 25.1 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 21.1 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	144	23.8"	1280 720	HPN36D9 HP X24ih

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 121%

UFO

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 115%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $504Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	34x
Core i7-5930KIntel $599Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	31x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	26x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	13x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $325Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	14x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	7x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $139Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	6x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 168 samples	7x
M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 90%, 146 samples	6x
HyperX 2666 C15 4x16GBKingstonBench 99%, 256 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,418

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $135	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12600K $215	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $260	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $54	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16