Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 12:21
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 111
2-Core 203
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 736
66% 559 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 58.3
45% 59.9 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 58.8
Splatting 51.9
47% 57.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1603 1664 1699 1695 1670 1431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,750
Write 1,468
Mixed 564
SusWrite 1627
303% 1,352 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 60
216% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 744
DQ Mixed 635
542% 800 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 275%
Great: 306%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$133
757GB free
Firmware: FP2A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 116
Mixed 58.7
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$120
306GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 86 84 85 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 83.7
Write 83.4
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 84.6
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 99%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$90
69GB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 136 135 136 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 153
Write 146
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 135
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 96%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
121GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98.8
Write 42.2
Mixed 50.4
71% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.5
124% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
58GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 48.2
Mixed 12.4
56% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 21.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 23.8" 1280 720 HPN36D9 HP X24ih
Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $95
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback