Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570DD
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 01:02
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 62
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 157
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 454
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 63%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 966 1399 1049 1144 742 633 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,442
Write 535
Mixed 977
SusWrite 989
220% 986 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 23.4
128% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 693
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 470
402% 590 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 184%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CB8GS2666.C8RT Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 26.2
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 21.3
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0" 1475 767
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 55%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD

The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $310Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $135Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12600K $215Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $54G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback