Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570DD
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 00:45
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 177
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 452
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 1309 1300 1274 1336 247 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,451
Write 1372
Mixed 1,041
SusWrite 1,061
277% 1,231 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 22.8
130% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 602
DQ Mixed 471
403% 593 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 190%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2666.C8RT Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 25.9
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 21.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 0" 1475 767
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $146Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $189Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback