Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570DD
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 00:39
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 97
2-Core 185
64% 115 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 440
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1024 1393 1371 1197 448 671 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,474
Write 1,392
Mixed 1,032
SusWrite 1,017
276% 1,229 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 22.6
131% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 707
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 134
211% 412 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 184%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2666.C8RT Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 26.2
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 0" 1475 767
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060 $299Crucial MX500 250GB $35
Intel Core i5-12400F $146Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $93Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback