bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH61CR
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 23:51
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 149
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 214
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 16.8
15% 17.5 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 15.7
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 106 58 57 59 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.4% Below average
Read 130
Write 187
Mixed 145
SusWrite 85.7
31% 137 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 14.8
53% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 143
120% 175 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 9.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 9 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM5791 E2350
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback