PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5K SE (all builds) |
Memory | 1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20080707 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 24 '17 at 08:06 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
39.2%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
Sapphire(174B E305) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SUV300S37A240G 240GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
34.6%
Below average
|
|||
50.1%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024 MB
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 37x |
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $17Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 17x |
Core2 Duo E8200Intel $12Bench 40%, 4,318 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 9x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |