Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160310
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '17 at 18:55
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 75.3 1-Core 79.5 2-Core 147 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 244 32% 243 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 138 Reflection 142 Parallax 124 112% 135 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 132 Splatting 101 93% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB 9,379 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM02D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 24738 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 177 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 85 85 529 (B2) Unknown 95 95 198 (B3) Unknown 95 95 378 (B4) Unknown 95 95 7686 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 5 (E8) Unknown 95 95 3834 (F1) Unknown 230 230 27693692383 (F2) Unknown 95 95 22454964883	71% Very good	Read 456 Write 341 Mixed 392 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 12.9 88% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 53.7 65% 116 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 80%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 42GB free Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 107 15530595 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 31413390835841 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 332 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 89 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 15 40 34362359823 (C2) HDA temperature 15 40 34362359823 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 15530595 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 15530595 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 15530595 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2211 (EA) Unknown 0 0 326 (F1) Unknown 0 0 326 (F2) Unknown 0 0 233	70.2% Very good	Read 502 Write 197 Mixed 230 68% 309 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 87.3 4K Mixed 11.7 104% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 11.8 59% 134 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 83%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 166 164 6700 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4136 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7152 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 37 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 12210 (C2) HDA temperature 118 106 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	79.1% Very good	Read 140 Write 136 Mixed 139 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.21 108% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 96%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 305GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 111 106 7408 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5666 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 15 15 62518 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 359 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 90 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 670115 (C2) HDA temperature 115 94 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46.1% Average	Read 77.4 Write 83.2 Mixed 75.6 59% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.21 74% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 57%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 258GB free Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 82 64 148027301 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1641 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 15014814 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 -979252535358 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 41 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032834 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 60 621936667 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2309 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 77309411355 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -122367913222741 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6436108671 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4456011244 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	55.8% Above average	Read 101 Write 94 Mixed 61.3 63% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 0.63 4K Mixed 0.49 92% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 16GB 234 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	40.4% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 17 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.7 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 89.8 44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	26x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	12x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 456 samples	3x
F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 197 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16