Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '16 at 16:19
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54% Above average
1-Core 87
2-Core 165
60% 126 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 569
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 581
39% 581 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E207) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Lighting 122
Reflection 78.7
Parallax 164
32% 122 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 114
Splatting 87.2
30% 87 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 33%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$55
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 475
Write 377
Mixed 402
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 19.7
109% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 19.1
46% 95.5 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 123%
Samsung PB22-JS3 FDE 2.5" 128GB
33GB free
Firmware: VBM9LD1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 204
Write 177
Mixed 173
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 8.53
4K Mixed 6.57
40% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 8.45
DQ Mixed 6.4
8% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 31%
Seagate ST31000322CS 1TB-$250
596GB free
Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
50% Average
Read 88.9
Write 85.5
Mixed 72.8
62% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.15
46% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
246GB free
Firmware: KC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 85
Write 90.2
Mixed 87.7
66% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.52
91% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
84GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 65
Write 77.1
Mixed 76.7
97% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.23
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 11,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $208

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $792
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback