Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N270 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Memory 29.8 1-Core 5.5 2-Core 5 12% 13.4 Pts	4-Core 9 8-Core 9.5 1% 9.25 Pts	64-Core 9.2 1% 9.2 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 60GB 1,468 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 100 10748636 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 160 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 27900107587219 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3279 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 718 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 37 54 3538981 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 105 100 10748636 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 96 96 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11840 (EA) Unknown 0 0 14016 (F1) Unknown 0 0 14016 (F2) Unknown 0 0 28096	22.5% Poor	Read 105 Write 51.3 Mixed 79.1 17% 78.5 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 8.93 46% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 21.8 DQ Write 40.9 DQ Mixed 8.34 13% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 51%
Generic- Multi-Card 64GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 18GB free, PID 0159 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	6.4% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 6.75 Mixed 8.56 12% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 0.85 57% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.4% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.76% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 1.7 6% 2 GB/s	Latency 256 16% 256 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.76% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16