Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '17 at 20:15
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 162
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 368
40% 317 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
MSI(1462 1880) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 6.22
11% 10.2 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 11
Splatting 7.48
8% 9.51 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 384
Mixed 408
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 39.1
143% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 94.2
103% 176 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
689GB free
Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 33.6
Write 79
Mixed 65.5
45% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.51
108% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
28GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 63.4
Write 55.7
Mixed 52.5
43% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.42
91% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 69%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
4.5TB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 125
Write 95.9
Mixed 39.7
100% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 5.87
4K Mixed 0.45
217% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 57%
Maxtor OneTouch III 300GB
206GB free, PID 7200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 31.4
Write 31.1
Mixed 29.5
39% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 4.87
4K Mixed 0.33
179% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 17
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 14
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback