AZW Speed S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAZW Speed S  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW Speed S
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '23 at 16:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8109U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 142
68% 109 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 199
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.18% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 11.7
8% 9.93 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 10.1
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.18%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8J41100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 919 329 583 769 535 633 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 940
Write 97.5
Mixed 218
SusWrite 628
103% 471 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 15.3
84% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 405
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 344
250% 328 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 115%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS632A.M4FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.6% Good
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 17.8
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 27" 1280 720 SAM727A Odyssey G40B
Typical Speed S Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: AZW Speed S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback