Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 23:41
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 51
1-Core 102
2-Core 186
61% 113 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 363
43% 331 Pts
64-Core 332
21% 332 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-g4000 1024G 1TB
758GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08193
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1494 1943 1559 1161 1147 1598 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,060
Write 1,104
Mixed 1,323
SusWrite 1,484
282% 1,243 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 45.9
133% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 529
DQ Mixed 667
514% 712 MB/s
Poor: 216%
This bench: 208%
Great: 552%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$34
223GB free
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 3.9 7.7 5.5 21 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 324
Write 187
Mixed 171
SusWrite 22.5
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 8.9
46% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 8.8
DQ Mixed 11
21% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD4AGUA8A-26N1900 Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 12.6
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 5
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 13 0 60 0" 1920 1080
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $643
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback