Fujitsu AMILO Pro Edition V3545

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFujitsu AMILO Pro Edition V3545  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU AMILO Pro Edition V3545
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '17 at 18:50
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7200-$83
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 44.9
31% 43.5 Pts
4-Core 45.3
8-Core 45.7
6% 45.5 Pts
64-Core 45.5
3% 45.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7300
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 10D7) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dum Ver. 7.15.11.7948
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.18% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.42
Parallax 0.12
0% 0.29 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.18%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHZ2080BH G2 80GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00000009 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 59.6
Mixed 26.9
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.3
87% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback