| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Notebook W65_67SJ (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Clevo W65_67SJ |
| Memory | 14.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150724 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 10 '17 at 19:52 |
| Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.3%
Good
|
67% 112 Pts
|
32% 237 Pts
|
15% 239 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 850M
Clevo(1558 6501) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8859
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
17% 18.1 fps
|
14% 17 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
85.3%
Excellent
|
82% 369 MB/s
|
124% 48.9 MB/s
|
98% 195 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
57.4%
Above average
|
57% 20 GB/s
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
54% 73.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical W65_67SJ Builds (Compare 100 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Notebook W65_67SJ
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4710MQIntel $50Bench 60%, 15,557 samples | 32x |
| Core i7-4810MQIntel $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples | 23x |
| Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples | 54x |
| GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples | 45x |
| HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $87 |