Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110211
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '17 at 03:14
Run Duration	93 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 55.7 2-Core 112 55% 85.1 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 266 30% 233 Pts	64-Core 253 16% 253 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.4% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 134 Parallax 128 101% 129 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 134 Splatting 108 96% 118 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 110%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 20341 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3606 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 92 92 248 (AE) Unknown 100 100 223 (B5) Unknown 100 100 13305878546415 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 84 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 319 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 92 92 8 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	46.2% Average	Read 327 Write 246 Mixed 233 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 54.1 4K Mixed 5.03 59% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 17.1 DQ Write 48.8 DQ Mixed 4.81 12% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.4% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 9.7 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-890GPA-UD3H Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	17x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	39x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	30x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16