PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 7 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Apple MacPro3,1 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Apple Mac-F42C88C8 |
Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20080229 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 09 '17 at 19:45 |
Run Duration | 221 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
|
50.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
85.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
23.6%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
260GB free
Firmware: CP100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
|||
10.6%
Very poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples | 98x |
Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples | 18x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 22x |
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples | 11x |
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $388 |