Lenovo 82RF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive467% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82RF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220415
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateJun 10 '23 at 13:13
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 70.8
1-Core 191
2-Core 374
109% 212 Pts
4-Core 702
8-Core 1222
116% 962 Pts
64-Core 1,996
124% 1,996 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AED) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1109
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 175
Parallax 27
18% 74.8 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 0.3
14% 18.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TB
611GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3311 3356 2676 1577 1571 1562 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
467% Outstanding
Read 2,943
Write 3,416
Mixed 3,148
SusWrite 2342
669% 2,962 MB/s
4K Read 88.1
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 128
422% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1788
DQ Write 1560
DQ Mixed 1,683
1,259% 1,677 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 467%
Great: 458%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.6
Write 42.2
Mixed 52.5
67% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
56% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 45.2
133% 46.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 26.2
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 122%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82RF Builds (Compare 3,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82RF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback