Toshiba Satellite U845W

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite U845W (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	7.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1792 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121011
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '17 at 15:11
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3517U 8,454 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 88 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 136 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 194 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FBA0) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2712 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 3.73 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 2.88 3% 3.78 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.57 4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC256HBGJ-000H1 256GB 517 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6098 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3979 (B1) Unknown 97 97 90 (B3) Unknown 92 92 502 (B4) Unknown 92 92 6026 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 35 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 74 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21981379079	62.5% Good	Read 460 Write 245 Mixed 314 75% 340 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 18.7 69% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 80.8 DQ Mixed 61.1 76% 140 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 70%
SDXC Card 64GB 1,393 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 11GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	6.76% Terrible	Read 18 Write 9.47 Mixed 11.9 15% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.38 4K Write 0.42 4K Mixed 0.97 60% 1.59 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.76% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 10GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.4% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.8 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite U845W Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite U845W

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	3x

SSD
MZMPD256HAGM-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 72%, 232 samples	1x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 6GBSamsungBench 45%, 61 samples	1x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 10GBSamsungBench 25%, 1 sample	1x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 10GBUnknownBench 38%, 6 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16