Asus PRIME H410M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H410M-K (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201019
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '23 at 11:55
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10105F 14,843 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 92.9 1-Core 127 2-Core 251 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 667 62% 516 Pts	64-Core 679 42% 679 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.6% Very good	Lighting 98.6 Reflection 95 Parallax 89.3 80% 94.3 fps	MRender 98.9 Gravity 88.9 Splatting 54.7 63% 80.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
RX7 2.5 120GB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 4.5 5.1 5.1 67 1.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 497 Write 214 Mixed 320 SusWrite 24.2 58% 264 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 7.9 65% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 75%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 82GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 71 71 72 71 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 77 Write 39.7 Mixed 49.7 SusWrite 69.5 44% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 40%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$33 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 138GB free Firmware: CC37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 92 93 93 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 95.8 Write 94.7 Mixed 58 SusWrite 92.8 63% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB 77,202 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 24.1 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 31.4 SC Mixed 24.2 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H410M-K Builds (Compare 2,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H410M-K

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	1,165x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	614x
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	273x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	331x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	249x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	228x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	150x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	137x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	129x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	170x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	58x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16