Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	Gigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '23 at 09:33
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 92.1 1-Core 143 2-Core 273 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 690 72% 580 Pts	64-Core 723 45% 723 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Zotac(19DA 5527) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Lighting 92.7 Reflection 92.7 Parallax 85.5 76% 90.3 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 82.2 Splatting 74.2 72% 90 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1321 407 405 409 408 409 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	276% Outstanding	Read 2,564 Write 2,252 Mixed 1,478 SusWrite 560 382% 1,713 MB/s	4K Read 66.1 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 88.4 303% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,004 DQ Write 1,022 DQ Mixed 1,141 823% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 302%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 177 178 180 180 177 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 148 Mixed 116 SusWrite 178 117% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 230% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 99,207 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 22.7 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 23.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	728x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	165x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	160x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	183x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	162x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	125x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	198x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	63x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16