Today's hottest deals

Winmate DCU120

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemWinmate DCU120  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 M116P
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '23 at 09:31
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
20.5% Poor
Memory 29.4
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 44.7
24% 38.3 Pts
4-Core 67.8
8-Core 71
9% 69.4 Pts
64-Core 60.5
4% 60.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 0.5
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ADATA_IM2S3164-256GCTB4 256GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A210312b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 106 107 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35% Below average
Read 203
Write 107
Mixed 114
SusWrite 106
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 14.8
51% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 95.9
DQ Mixed 82.8
68% 96.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 258
16% 258 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DCU120 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Winmate DCU120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback