Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

10 months ago, 9 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 39 User benchmarks, average bench 25% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	20.5% Poor	Memory 29.4 1-Core 40.8 2-Core 44.7 24% 38.3 Pts	4-Core 67.8 8-Core 71 9% 69.4 Pts	64-Core 60.5 4% 60.5 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 0.5 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ADATA_IM2S3164-256GCTB4 256GB 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: A210312b SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 106 107 107 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35% Below average	Read 203 Write 107 Mixed 114 SusWrite 106 29% 132 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 25 4K Mixed 14.8 51% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 95.9 DQ Mixed 82.8 68% 96.1 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 258 16% 258 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 25%, 39 samples	4x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	4x

SSD
ADATA_IM2S3164-256GCTB5 256GBBench 68%, 1 sample	2x
ADATA_IM2S3164-256GCTB4 256GBBench 41%, 1 sample	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16