Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 118% UFO	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	414% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230518
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '23 at 22:19
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$368 4,023 User benchmarks, average bench 117% AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Memory 96.6 1-Core 195 2-Core 387 120% 226 Pts	4-Core 723 8-Core 1183 117% 953 Pts	64-Core 1,731 107% 1,731 Pts
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 123%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31% Below average	Lighting 41.9 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 53.8 34% 42.7 fps	MRender 28.4 Gravity 43.9 Splatting 22 25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$88 58,572 User benchmarks, average bench 341% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3148 3170 3158 1946 656 656 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	414% Outstanding	Read 2,962 Write 3,212 Mixed 2,971 SusWrite 2,122 635% 2,817 MB/s	4K Read 72.5 4K Write 201 4K Mixed 94.5 338% 123 MB/s	DQ Read 1,582 DQ Write 1,231 DQ Mixed 1,395 1,047% 1,403 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 414% Great: 442%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 21GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 6.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 215 Write 18.2 SusWrite 7.7 61% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 110% 9.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G322x31.5GB 6,603 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	189% Outstanding	MC Read 80.1 MC Write 59.7 MC Mixed 65.4 196% 68.4 GB/s	SC Read 65.5 SC Write 58.9 SC Mixed 57.6 173% 60.7 GB/s	Latency 51.9 77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 150% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 218%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 413%

UFO

Desktop 117%

UFO

Workstation 417%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $368Bench 117%, 4,023 samples	35x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD $279Bench 112%, 4,548 samples	31x
Ryzen 9 7900XAMD $394Bench 116%, 2,844 samples	18x

GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,800Bench 370%, 25,956 samples	12x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $651Bench 240%, 46,082 samples	10x
RX 7900-XTAMD $900Bench 220%, 6,228 samples	8x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	17x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $88Bench 341%, 58,572 samples	11x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $189Bench 460%, 45,230 samples	5x

RAM
F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 166%, 17,639 samples	13x
KF560C36-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 178%, 10,381 samples	6x
Skill Intl F5-6000J3038F162x16GBGBench 193%, 4,084 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $2,272

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16