Asus Z170-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170-K  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 04 '23 at 16:02
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 54.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 200
65% 121 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 530
55% 445 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 7.8
5% 11.7 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 16.3
15% 18.7 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 16.2
16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L3 SSD 240GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM07.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 3.6 44 150 105 77 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.8% Very poor
Read 206
Write 132
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 72.5
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
26% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 99%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
57GB free
Firmware: 2.28.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 118 118 121 118 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
62% Good
Read 373
Write 148
Mixed 181
SusWrite 119
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 29.1
107% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 120
98% 141 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
684GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 114 114 113 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 105
SusWrite 114
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
807GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 108 108 102 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 129
Write 97.9
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 106
134% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
211% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 63%
WD Elements 1TB
467GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 38 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 40.5
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 39.7
52% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 8.4
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-K Builds (Compare 2,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-K - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $754
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback