Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 179 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 554 54% 444 Pts	64-Core 668 41% 668 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% PowerColor(148C 2385) 2GB CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Lighting 16 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 25 13% 16.1 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 14.6 13% 15.5 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gamer L TA1D0240A 240GB 1,013 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 401 Write 244 Mixed 24.9 48% 223 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 13.6 33% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 35.4 DQ Write 41.4 DQ Mixed 66.6 42% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 95%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 540GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 82 81 80 80 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 87 Write 85.9 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 80.5 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.7 151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB 87,891 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 33.7 99% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 24 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	131x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	114x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $358

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16