Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	51.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171003
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '23 at 16:50
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Memory 28.6 1-Core 13.6 2-Core 25.5 16% 22.6 Pts	4-Core 47.4 8-Core 79 8% 63.2 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.5% Average	Lighting 29.7 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 115 24% 58.5 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 92.8 Splatting 84.9 78% 97.1 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 47 41 49 45 46 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25% Poor	Read 258 Write 53.7 Mixed 76.4 SusWrite 46.9 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 9 28% 9.77 MB/s	DQ Read 92.4 DQ Write 48.9 DQ Mixed 65 50% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 121%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 166GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 127 131 117 88 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 175 Write 122 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 116 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 108%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 988GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 48 49 50 48 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	29% Poor	Read 93.8 Write 91.3 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 49 90% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 61%
WD My Passport 259F 3TB 1,516 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 333GB free, PID 259f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 117 116 118 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 79.4 Write 112 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 117 129% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 49%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 469 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 167GB free, PID 0577 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 20 22 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	6.74% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 20.4 Mixed 15.4 SusWrite 22.2 25% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.3 14% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 6.74% Great: 20%
Seagate FreeAgent 500GB 796 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 104GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 28 30 31 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 21.9 Write 28.8 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 29.9 35% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 49% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB 3,127 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 12.5 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 8.1 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 263 15% 263 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	144x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	42x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	49x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $995

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16