Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HC
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '23 at 12:54
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 61.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 250
80% 150 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 754
75% 613 Pts
64-Core 944
58% 944 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 13FC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 5.4
4% 27.3 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 6.4
5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1121 1136 1037 1012 1120 1113 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 938
Write 745
Mixed 745
SusWrite 1,090
198% 880 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 63.6
183% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 410
297% 388 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 179%
Great: 297%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3 2.7 2.6 3.1 3.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 2.9
7% 6.83 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 6.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC Builds (Compare 4,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback