Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 50%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '23 at 11:32
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 43.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 138
54% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 448
49% 389 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 143D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 82.4
Parallax 5.1
4% 30.7 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 6.3
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 471 336 312 344 323 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 993
Write 1,500
Mixed 1,122
SusWrite 402
227% 1,004 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 46.3
152% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 724
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 620
464% 623 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 140%
Great: 217%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 136 132 137 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 125
Mixed 55
SusWrite 135
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.6
239% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX432S20IB/16 Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.9% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 6.7
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 16,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 72%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback