HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 198E
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '23 at 10:38
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 97 2-Core 189 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 314 39% 297 Pts	64-Core 253 16% 253 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCA) CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Lighting 57.8 Reflection 61.2 Parallax 52.3 47% 57.1 fps	MRender 48.1 Gravity 53.9 Splatting 49.5 41% 50.5 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
BT58SSD09S 240GB 470 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0719A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 382 420 436 152 143 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 503 Write 431 Mixed 360 SusWrite 300 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 91.7 4K Mixed 29.4 126% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 42.6 86% 169 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 80%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB 4,700 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: FJ1M SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 193 194 198 195 199 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 194 Mixed 103 SusWrite 195 124% 170 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 244% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 7,948 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 17.3 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 11.5 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProDesk 400 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	421x
Core i3-4130Intel $42Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	130x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	106x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	236x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	84x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	24x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x

RAM
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	33x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	26x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,467 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16