Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR) 17,422 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	21% Poor	Memory 25.8 1-Core 36 2-Core 69.1 25% 43.6 Pts	4-Core 98.5 8-Core 75.4 12% 86.9 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 39EF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	5.02% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 6.6 Parallax 10.7 5% 7.8 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 8.7 Splatting 6.2 5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.02% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: XD0R3C0F SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 164 163 188 233 232 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.2% Below average	Read 201 Write 182 Mixed 172 SusWrite 184 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 15.1 52% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.8 DQ Write 55.9 DQ Mixed 29.6 25% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 281 14% 281 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 17,422 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16